The Kerala Legislative Assembly’s ongoing budget session witnessed intense political confrontation as opposition parties disrupted proceedings over the Sabarimala gold theft controversy. The issue dominated the House as members from the opposition demanded accountability and clarity regarding the investigation.
What Triggered the Disruption?
Opposition lawmakers from the United Democratic Front (UDF) raised strong objections over the handling of the Sabarimala gold theft case. Their protest gained momentum after a Vigilance Court granted bail to the Sabarimala tantri (chief priest), Kandararu Rajeevaru, observing that investigators had not produced sufficient evidence against him in the alleged gold loss cases.
The opposition alleged that the investigation lacked transparency and questioned whether there was political interference in the probe.
Opposition Demands and Protest
UDF leaders accused the state government of mishandling the case and demanded further investigation into the alleged irregularities. They also called for accountability from the Devaswom Minister and sought assurances that the investigation would proceed without political influence.
During the session, opposition MLAs staged protests inside the Assembly, raised slogans, and disrupted proceedings, forcing the Speaker to continue legislative business amid the commotion.
Government’s Response
The ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) defended the investigation, stating that the probe is being conducted under judicial supervision. The government maintained that due process is being followed and denied allegations of political interference.
Ministers emphasized that the case is under proper legal scrutiny and assured the Assembly that necessary steps are being taken to ensure transparency and fairness.
Background of the Sabarimala Gold Theft Case
The controversy revolves around alleged discrepancies involving gold-clad plates and other valuables associated with the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple. Reports of missing or mismanaged gold items led to an official investigation, which has since become a politically sensitive issue in the state.
The case has attracted widespread public attention due to the religious and cultural significance of the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.
Political Significance
The issue has intensified political tensions between the ruling LDF and the opposition UDF. With the Assembly in session and public scrutiny increasing, the case is likely to remain a major topic of debate in Kerala politics.
As the budget session continues, further discussions and possible developments in the investigation may influence the political climate in the state.
